Actual disagreements are demanding to accomplish, or even more durable to take care of, for the ghost of ultimate contract consistently haunts them. The Babylonian Talmud, even if, escapes from that ghost of contract, and provokes unsettling questions: Are there any stipulations less than which confrontation may perhaps represent a real courting among minds? Are disagreements constantly in basic terms transitority steps towards ultimate contract? needs to a group of war of words regularly suggest contract, as in an contract to disagree? what's Talmud? rethinks the duty of philological, literary, old, and cultural research of the Talmud. It introduces a facet of this job that has top been approximated by means of the philosophical, anthropological, and ontological interrogation of individual in courting to the Other-whether animal, divine, or human. In either engagement and disengagement with post-Heideggerian traditions of concept, Sergey Dogopolski enhances philological-historical and cultural methods to the Talmud with a rigorous anthropological, ontological, and Talmudic inquiry. He redefines where of the Talmud and its examine, either conventional and educational, within the highbrow map of the West, arguing that Talmud is a scholarly paintings of its personal and represents a primary highbrow self-discipline, no longer a trifling program of logical, grammatical, or perhaps rhetorical arts for the aim of textual hermeneutics. In Talmudic highbrow paintings, confrontation is a basic type. what's Talmud? rediscovers confrontation because the final situation of finite human life or co-existence.